Heroes and Rebels in the Family Tree—Samuel Kett
Heroes and Rebels in the Family Tree—Samuel
Kett
Samuel
Kett is a direct descendant by 19 generations of Thomas Kett, father of Robert
Kett. Like his infamous ancestor, Samuel
was also a farmer and eventually found himself owning a mill farm and employing
a couple of men. By 1863, the milling
business began to lose money and Samuel was hard-pressed to get out of the poor
business he had gotten into. His only
thought was to find a way to burn down the mill and claim the insurance
money. Here is his story.
Samuel was
born on December 10, 1810 in Theberton, Suffolk, England, the son of Zachariah
Kett 1774-1846 and Mary Block. He was
baptised in the parish church of Theberton on January 27, 181. He was the middle child of seven born to
Zachariah and Mary Kett. Their children
were:
1. John Kett 1801–1843
2. Kezia Kett 1804–1853
3. Mary Kett 1807–
4. Samuel Kett 1810–1886
5. Elizabeth Kett 1813–
6. David Kett 1816–
7. Sarah Kett 1818–1820
Samuel
Kett married Sarah Kett on October 16, 1834In 1841, Samuel was an agricultural
labourer living with his wife, Sarah at his father’s house on East bridge in
Theberton. By 1851, Samuel was a Farmer
of 50 acres and employing 1 man and a boy.
His business grew and by 1861 he was responsible for farming 84 acres,
employing 2 men and 1 boy.
By 1863,
Samuel had purchased the mill farm and was not prospering in the business. The following stories record his appearance before
the court in 1863 on charges of arson and his trial which occurred in 1864.
The Bury and Norwich Post, and Suffolk
Herald
Tuesday
08 December 1863
WRENTHAM.
THE
CHARGE OF ARSON AGAINST A MILLER.—At a
Special
Petty Sessions, held at Halesworth, on Thursday, Samuel Kett, miller, was
brought up on remand before the Rev. H. Owen (Chairman), H. A. S. Bence, Esq.,
and T. Rant, Esq., charged with unlawfully and maliciously setting fire to a
malting, granary, steam-mill, and other buildings, in his possession, at
Wrentham, on the 8th of November, with intent to defraud the Royal
Exchange Insurance Fire-office.—Mr. Read, of Halesworth, again appeared for the
prisoner; Mr. Rickards, solicitor to the Royal Exchange Insurance-office, was
present to watch the case for the prosecution.—The depositions previously
taken, and reported in last week’s paper, having been read over, p.-c. Smith
deposed that on the morning after the fire he saw the prisoner returning home, and
he was dressed in a dark hairy coat, but witness did not notice if it were
clean or dirty. Had spoken to prisoner
several times about the fire, but he never was the man to say he hoped it would
be found out, or anything of that sort.
Thought the prisoner sat on a light coat when he came home in his
cart.—Mr. Read observed that two witnesses (Kett and Rose) had swore that the
prisoner started from Wenhaston on the Monday morning in a dog-cart with a white
coat on.—Smith, recalled and questioned by Mr. Bence, positively swore the
prisoner wore a black coat when he arrived at Wrentham on the Monday
morning.—Robert Lemon, of Uggeshall, deposed that on the night of the fire, at
about a quarter-past eleven, he heard a horse galloping towards Wrentham, By
Blyford cross-ways was not the nearest way to Wrentham, but it was the
quietest, as it would not be necessary to go through Wangford-street.—John
Borrett, in the prisoner’s employ, was examined at great length, but could no
recollect what dress his master had on when he left home—thought he wore his
black hairy coat. On the Monday morning
when he returned he had a light coat.
Witness was the last person on the premises on the night before the
fire, but his master never made any enquiries of him as to how it occurred. This witness also gave evidence as to the
small quantity of corn in the granaries; as to the sufficiency of the buildings
not destroyed for the purposes of the business; as to the prisoner’s telling
him times went hard and he should like to see his money again; as to there
being no water in the tubs when he (witness) arrived at the fire, the taps
being turned the wrong way; and as to finding bundles of sticks, about three
feet long, tied with tarred string round the posts holding up the tubs, which
were in the coal-house. Other evidence
was also given, and the Bench fully committed the prisoner for trial at the
next Bury Assizes, bail being refused.
Mr. Rickards was bound over to prosecute on behalf of the Royal Exchange
Insurance Company.
Comments
Post a Comment